Refutation: The Message

The late Eugene Peterson’s “The Message” translation is worth an analysis; no less than ten MILLION people either read or endorse “The Message” translation (including some of the more well-known people out there such as the late Billy Graham, Joyce Meyer, Hillsong’s Brian Houston, etc.). That is a lot of people reading or endorsing a translation that is supposedly a “paraphrase” of God’s Word. God’s Word is living, active, sharper than any two-edged sword, completely breathed out by God [who cannot lie—Numbers 23:19), the same yesterday, today and forever, and profitable for teaching, reproof, correction and training in righteousness so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work (Hebrews 4:12; 13:8; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; Psalm 12:6; John 17:17). “The Message”, however, was not breathed out by God. Instead, it was “breathed out” by man (and it appears one man, at that).

When doing research on this topic, I came across the word “herephrase.” It’s a word I found from listening to a program known as Pirate Christian Radio (a SOLID Bible discernment program dedicated to comparing stuff said in the name of God to the Word of God). A herephrase is a “paraphrase of the Bible that is heretical.” Pirate Christian Radio states that “The Message” is a “very popular example of a herephrase.”

The next logical question to ask is, “How is The Message translation a herephrase?” According to Lance Goodall in his book Hellsong, the Word “Lord” appears no less than 7,970 times in the King James version of the Bible. “The Message” uses it 71 times. That is a huge difference. In fact, the ratio of usage between the two translations is 112:1.

Furthermore, in the New Testament, “The Message” NEVER directly honors Christ as Lord. “The Lord Jesus” occurs 118 times in the King James version. “The Lord Jesus Christ” appears 84 times, but neither phrase (NEITHER) appears in “The Message.” Apparently no other translation makes such an omission. Goodall goes on to say that Judas Iscariot (the one who betrayed Jesus) never referred to Jesus as Lord either (ouch), but that’s for another day.

What’s the big deal about omitting “The Lord Jesus” and “The Lord Jesus Christ”, you ask? Well, salvation is found in nobody else but Jesus (Acts 4:12). Because we have all sinned (i.e., broken God’s law; see Exodus 20:1-17) and fallen short of God’s perfect standard, we cannot save ourselves and inherit the free gift of heaven (Romans 3:23; 6:23; Ephesians 2:1-9; Matthew 5:48). God had to solve the sin problem because He is a merciful and loving God but also a just, holy God who must punish sin (1 John 4:8; Exodus 34:7). He solved that problem by sending Jesus Christ, the infinite God-man (or God in human flesh), to die on the cross and rise from the dead to pay the penalty for our sins and purchase a place in heaven for us (John 1:1, 14; Isaiah 53:6; 1 Timothy 1:15; Matthew 1:21; John 1:29). According to Blue Letter Bible, the word “Lord” comes from the Greek word “kyrios” (from the root word kuros), which means, “he to whom a person or thing belongs, about which he has power of deciding; master, lord.” When we trust in Christ alone for salvation (via the gifts of repentance and faith given to the believer, per such texts as 2 Timothy 2:22-26 and Romans 10:5-17), Christ becomes our Lord. To omit that title from Him is tantamount to contradicting what God’s Word says about him. It’s basically to strip Him of His deity.

Other authors have noticed other differences between “The Message” and other translations. These differences include those in orthodoxysinand everlasting life, among other things. I wanted to do some comparative work in looking at the alleged “The Lord Jesus” and “The Lord Jesus Christ” omissions. I won’t look at every one of them (that would warrant an exhaustive list, a book, even), but I do want to look at a few in an effort to show how “The Message” is indeed the herephrase that Pirate Christian Radio claims it to be. I show this by comparing “The Message” to the NASB (New American Standard Bible) and NKJV (New King James Version) versions of the Bible.

First passage: Romans 5:1-2

  • NASB: “Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have obtained our introduction by faith into this grace in which we stand; and we exult in hope of the glory of God.”
  • NKJV: “Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom also we have access by faith into this grace in which we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.”
  • The Message: “By entering through faith into what God has always wanted to do for us—set us right with him, make us fit for him—we have it all together with God because of our Master Jesus. And that’s not all: We throw open our doors to God and discover at the same moment that he has already thrown open his door to us. We find ourselves standing where we always hoped we might stand—out in the wide open spaces of God’s grace and glory, standing tall and shouting our praise.”

As you can see, the NASB and NKJV versions use the phrase “Lord Jesus Christ.” “The Message”, however, simply calls him “Master Jesus.” Furthermore, Peterson changes the meaning of the passage by not referring to Christ in the rest of the passage. The other versions, however, state it is through Him also we rejoice/exult “…in hope of the glory of God.” Peterson simply calls Jesus “Master” and does nothing more (well, except make those two verses a lot wordier than what they really are). That is an absolute changing/contradicting of what God’s Word says about Him. Furthermore, because the excessive wordiness is technically adding to God’s Word, Peterson is proved a liar in this instance (Proverbs 30:6).

Second passage: 2 Thessalonians 2:15-17

  • NASB: “So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught, whether by word of mouth or by letter from us. Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, who has loved us and given us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, comfort and strengthen your hearts in every good work and word.”
  • NKJV: “Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the traditions which you were taught, whether by word or our epistle. Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, and our God and Father, who has loved us and given us everlasting consolation and good hope by grace, comfort your hearts and establish you in every good word and work.”
  • The Message: “So, friends, take a firm stand, feet on the ground and head high. Keep a tight grip on what you were taught, whether in personal conversation or by our letter. May Jesus himself and God our Father, who reached out in love and surprised you with gifts of unending help and confidence, put a fresh heart in you, invigorate your work, enliven your speech.”

Once again, Peterson makes the passage wordier and, more importantly, removes the words “Lord” and “Christ.” Paul uses the Greek word “Christos” (from the root word chrio) for “Christ” in that passage. Blue Letter Bible states that “Christos” means “anointed…the Messiah, the Son of God.” Peterson has essentially reduced Christ’s role to that of man, stripping Him of His Lordship and holiness. This, like the first example, changes God’s Word.

Final passage: Jude 1:17-19

  • NASB: “But you, beloved, ought to remember the words that were spoken beforehand by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ, that they were saying to you, “In the last time there will be mockers, following after their own ungodly lusts.” These are the ones who cause divisions, worldly-minded, devoid of the Spirit.”
  • NKJV: “But you, beloved, remember the words which were spoken before by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ: how they told you that there would be mockers in the last time who would walk accordingly to their own ungodly lusts. These are sensual persons, who cause divisions, not having the Spirit.”
  • The Message: But remember, dear friends, that the apostles of our Master, Jesus Christ, told us this would happen: “In the last days there will be people who don’t take these things seriously anymore. They’ll treat them like a joke, and make a religion of their own whims and lusts.” These are the ones who split churches, thinking only of themselves. There’s nothing to them, no sign of the Spirit!”

Once again, Peterson removes “Lord” and replaces it with “Master.” While this isn’t as gross a changing as the other two references since he does not remove “Christ”, it is a changing nonetheless because it removes the all-important word “Lord” from Jesus’ title. Jesus is more than just a “Master”; He is also Lord (see 2 Peter).

As mentioned, this is not an exhaustive list. One can easily find other omissions at the beginning of the apostle Paul’s letters (1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, etc.). The reality is that Peterson clearly does not give proper honor to Christ with his blatant omission of the phrases “The Lord Jesus” and “The Lord Jesus Christ.” He essentially reduces Christ to that of a man or any ordinary master (but Christ is more than that; He is the Savior of the world). By doing so, he makes “The Message” translation a herephrase.

I never knew Eugene Peterson. I certainly do not write this post to vilify him posthumously. However, what he did with his “Message” translation is dishonor the Lord Jesus Christ. Furthermore, given the mass amount of people who still either quote from it or endorse it, it was warranted to briefly analyze this particular translation. It is certainly not something people should be using as a primary Bible translation. Unless you’re reading this for research purposes, please do not use this translation.

NOTE: This post originally appeared on my blog, I did make some editorial changes on it.

Published by Clint Adams

My name is Clinton Adams. I am a born-again Christian. I used to have the blog "" After taking it down, I have since rebooted as "The Earnest Layman" as I earnestly contend for the faith once for all entrusted to the saints (Jude 3). I also promote sound Christian doctrine and rebuke that which contradicts it (Titus 1:9). I mainly do book reviews. However, I also do other types of posts (normally extensive). Should you request a certain topic, I will most definitely consider it. :) If you ever have questions or comments on anything you read here, feel free to comment with your feedback on any of my posts. You can also email me at If you really like what you read here, you can always follow my blog. Thank you so much for reading!

22 thoughts on “Refutation: The Message

  1. To purposely ignore the proper translation of a passage and insert one that has no basis in the original languages in order to undergird a particular point of view is about the most dangerous thing that I can imagine. The only thing more concerning would be to discover large segments of the evangelical community being incapable of discerning this kind of problem — and not caring., Gary E. Gilley

    Your readers may find some good additional information at the following links:

    Click to access TheMessage2.pdf

    “The Message is certainly a huge “mess.”


      1. Yes, and it is a good reminder of what we need to get the information about the dangers of “The Mess” as far and as wide as possible.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with
Get started
%d bloggers like this: